“The best way to fight something is not to oppose it but rather to harness its own energy and convert that energy into learning”. (Maclean (2010)
After
watching the video clip by Professor David Crystal from Bangor University, he
debunked several myths about texting, such as texting is done by only kids,
Kids fill their text messages entirely with abbreviations, these abbreviations
that the kids use in their text messages are invented by themselves, since kids
are using abbreviations, they do not know how to spell the words correctly and
because the kids do not know how to spell correctly, it is affecting their
essays and their examinations hence it produces illiterate kids. His arguments
were supported with detail explanation and I partially agree with his
statements.
Technology
plays a significant role in communication these days and Short-Messaging-
Service (SMS) is admired especially among the young generation because it
offers economy of money and time. We hardly ever find a student who does not
have at least one mobile phone. Most of their mobile phones have internet
access that enables them to send and receive SMS anytime and anywhere as long
as there is coverage. Students have a
tendency to utilize it as an officially accepted and standard language and thus
make different errors from incorrect spelling to even ungrammatical sentence
constructions. The English language educators are facing a great challenge due
to this situation. The language of texting does not observe grammatical and
syntactic rules. So it is neither formal nor standard. In short, they are rapid,
they do not follow the rules of English grammar, they are relatively cheap,
more convenient, they allow creativity and saves secrecy especially when communicating
very personal affairs while sitting with others. Texting is developing its own
kind of grammar and conventions.
In my
opinion, texting can benefit weaker readers or slow learners who would
generally avoid reading books. Before a student can write and play with
abbreviated forms, he/she requires having a sense of how the sounds of a
language are linked with the letters of that language.
Other than
that, there is no verification that texting is ruining composition skills of
the students. Worldwide people verbalize differently from the way they write
the language. Generally, texting is swift, informal and only intended to be
read once and it is actually a way of talking with our fingers. Moreover, students
are exposed to writing in a more relaxing and less stressful atmosphere. Texting
also can be harnessed by educators to assist students learn school-related
content as when teachers encourage students to use messaging shorthand to spark
their thinking processes. The use of SMS can be useful in building student-
teacher relationships in enhancing students‟ comfort
level in school setting and in improving academic performance. A third party
says that (SMS) like slang language has its own language that has no effect on
Standard English (Russel, 2012). It seems being proficient in standard forms,
these learners are context conscious and can switch to the appropriate register
or style when writing formally.
On the
other hand, with the ever increasing use of text messaging among students,
especially teenagers, there has been a growing concern among educators,
parents, researchers and general public that this practice is damaging the use
of language in speaking and writing and will affect the standard forms in the
long run which is partially true. As an educator, I have noticed some of my
students using abbreviation in their essays. For example, instead of writing “you”,
they write “U” which is grammatically incorrect. Grammar rules are forgotten
with compulsive texters. I believe excessive texting will lead to poor
communications skills. Lots of research states that texting is negatively
affecting grammar skills in many kids.
Somehow, I
do agree with Professor David Crystal that issues with texting are more of a
social issue rather than educational issues. For example texting may change students’
social behaviour and attitude. Some students are addicted to text messages and
they could not live without it. Some students become lazy and refuse to write
essays while some are not punctual. These particular students will lack in
their social skills, they may not know how to communicate with people in real
life situation.
Although,
texting may have turned some people more lazy but the state of the obvious is
that the generation is growing and will not go back. Just like fuel prices,
land line to cell phones. We just have to accept the change and the transition
will be smoother. Text messaging is a perfect example of how people adapt and
mould language to suit different contexts.
In
conclusion, texting can be a very good tool to enhance language skills and sub
skills if controlled and written in proper English especially that it encompasses
the main corpus of people's communication. This is because (SMS) is widely used; some
schools in western countries embrace them in their lesson plans. Even some
teachers use the fast writing style to spark the students' learning. They allow
children to use SMS language in their first draft to get thoughts and ideas
into paper more quickly. Then students can go back to Standard English when
editing and revising. Therefore, texting can boost literacy skills.